| From: | Best Buy Reward Zone <BestBuyRewardZone@emailinfo.bestbuy.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Personal Shoppers and 500 Reward Zone® bonus points for our most valued customers |
| Date: | Tue, 18 May 2010 07:14:24 -0600 |
| To: |
|
| From: | Best Buy Reward Zone <BestBuyRewardZone@emailinfo.bestbuy.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Personal Shoppers and 500 Reward Zone® bonus points for our most valued customers |
| Date: | Tue, 18 May 2010 07:14:24 -0600 |
| To: |
|
*Warning: nerdy post ahead*
Anyone who knows me knows that I'm a big fan of change. I am constantly changing everything from my Starbucks drink to my personalized license plate, from my room setup to my computer configuration. When it comes to my computer setup, I'm pretty picky. I never close a window, and I like to have a lot of screen real estate. However, this can choke the average computer. For the past year, I've been working on a Dell Inspiron desktop with 6 gigs of RAM. Those 6 gigs worked for a while, and then I started having to close programs and restart every week or so (a hassle). I started out with two screens and eventually worked my way up to four with a special 4-head card. After I got tired of sluggish performance by running four screens off of a single card, I went down to three screens and then eventually back to two with a different, more powerful video card.Because I didn't want to spend $1200 on a high performance 4-head card and because my stock Dell machine was limited by the amount of physical space in my box and on my motherboard - one PCI-E slot, yesterday I spontaneously decidedĀ that I should assemble a computer from scratch. This is despite the fact that I've been out of the PC-building arena since 2002.
My two requirements were: multiple PCI-E slots for multiple video cards and more than 8 gigs of RAM. So yesterday afternoon, I walked into Fry's and started shopping. And a few hours later with a giant hole in my wallet...
I am now content, thanks to an Intel i7 processor, 12 freaking gigs of RAM, and two high performance video cards, each capable of running 3 screens.
Having never had more than 6 gigs available to me, I am finding that I comfortably sit around 6-7 gigs of memory usage while keeping about 25 windows open on my taskbar. (I know, so un-Maclike huh?) And my current monitor setup runs my 30" primary monitor, my two 24" screens stacked next to it, and a Hulu stream on my 47" LCD TV with no problems whatsoever. I've never gone all out like this before. This is (almost) my ideal setup. I just need to add one more 30" screen to the mix and I should be good. Now if this doesn't drive my productivity 10x, I don't know what will.A few months ago, I posted about a blue Nissan Sentra that was driving around with a Tustin Lexus license plate frame. [original post here] It caught my eye because I thought it was odd to see an older model Nissan driving around with a Lexus frame.
Well, as it turns out, today (4 months later) I happened to find myself behind the same car, except almost 20 miles away.
Today in Fullerton, CA
December in Costa Mesa, CA...
And here's a map to show where I came across the same car.
With the 3 million people living in Orange County, what are the odds? Maybe it happens more than we think.

A couple days ago, it was discovered that Posterous modifies links that users place on Posterous blogs and adds an affiliate code when the user doesn't provide one. For example, if I link to a product on an e-commerce site and the website I'm linking to has an affiliate program, Posterous will drop in their affiliate code so if you end up purchasing that product, Posterous will take the affiliate cut for the referral. Then TechCrunch picked up the story and the internet has been up in arms ever since.
Unfortunately, it seems like people don't really understand the issue. Here's what Posterous is NOT doing:Here's what Posterous IS doing:
The only potential problem here is for journalists who are reviewing products or services. The thinking is that, if there is an affiliate link attached, someone is making money if a conversion is made. And that's the moral issue being debated. But since the author of the post isn't making any money off the link, it really doesn't matter.
But to me, it seems like most of the upset people are just mad because Posterous didn't inform them of the change, and has nothing to do with the potential issue I see above. It's because they just feel like they have a right to know. The question I pose to them is...who cares? If doesn't affect users at all. Posterous CEO Sachin Agarwal even said that they had been using VigLink for 4 months before anyone even discovered the deal. And for a site in the Alexa top 500 (in the US), it just goes to show how transparently the service worked. The following comment was left on the original post about the discovery of the partnership by "Electronic Foodie":"Will Posterous be disclosing how much it made from its experiment with Viglink? Where will this money be directed towards? We believe the money Posterous made with Viglink, up until the time it officially notified its users of Viglink, should be donated to charitable organizations voted upon by its users."
Umm.....WHY? This might just be the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Contrary to what you believeĀ (and what the government may have told you), Electronic Foodie, nobody (even Posterous) owes you anything. Sure, it may have been nice to know about this change, but I'm not shareholder and neither are you, so if Posterous wants to keep this info on the DL for whatever reason, they have the right to do so.
So what do I think? Posterous is a free service, has to make money somehow, and is trying to come up with ways to monetize that DON'T involve sucky banner ads. Good on them for being creative. And kudos to VigLink and other companies who are thinking outside the box to help monetize the web in unobtrusive ways. Hello, web 3.0.
0 Comments